Depends on the angle. The shot which follows the aircraft's landing directly, shows its path clearly. The photo from side-on there's no relflection.
I have already said that I have not read all the posts here so unless I’ve commented on a particular post that you posted you have no way of knowing whether I’ve seen it or not. Most likely not because, as holden and others have noted, you’ve been propping up an agenda from day one on this story and it would take more running around than I have time to do, to check on what you’re deceiving us about this time.
“He happened to be flying in the area.” True statement. Nothing you said changes that.
“He managed to find the crash while the trail of the landing was still showing in the water.” True statement. Nothing you said changes that. It’s interesting, however, that one of his photos has that trail and the others I’ve seen don’t. What happened to the oil that made the sheen then? Maybe holden knows.
“Really good coincidental timing.” That’s the only thing I said that I’m not sure is true.
Depends on the angle. The shot which follows the aircraft's landing directly, shows its path clearly. The photo from side-on there's no relflection.