Place is teeming with people
Posted on 02/23/2014 3:09:07 PM PST by butterdezillion
OK. Be specific.
You say:
>> I have no need to discredit Lang, and the discrepancies between his story, Mark Miller’s story, and Puentes’ story already raise questions.
Enumerate. Specifically enumerate every discrepancy between Lang and Miller, Lang and Puentes, Miller and Puentes.
>> Helicopters are how the USCG drops divers into the water. If there was a helicopter there dropping low it could easily have been used to deliver “extra people” to the scene.
Extra people? What for? What was their mission? Specifically? What were they to do? Kill? Rescue? Observe? What?
>> But if it did so to rescue people, then why didn’t they rescue anybody, and why didn’t anybody say anything about it?
Yeah, why didn’t they? They didn’t rescue anyone and everyone saw them and said nothing. Why? Or they were unobserved. Really?
YOU tell me. Why?
Could it be that there were NO “extra people”? Just possibly? Is that a possibility? Did everyone say nothing because there were no “extra people”? Or are all the passengers “in on it”?
“Helicopters don’t do touch-and-goes; planes do, and the only plane there was Lang’s (as far as we know anyway...). “
Oh really. The people of San Diego will be glad to know that.
“Those will be heard in and around Coronado and in Imperial Beach, where Navy helicopter pilots go to practice touch-and-go landings. “
http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2011/Mar/09/navy-moving-more-helicopters-north-island/?#article-copy
Place is teeming with people
The population in all of eastern Molokai is under 5,200.
Every day they watch the skies waiting for a plane to land in the ocean.
It’s like a cargo cult.
But the apostates weren’t watching.
http://www.city-data.com/city/East-Molokai-Hawaii.html
>> If there was a helicopter there dropping low
And the evidence is??????
>> Lang apparently had photos of a DIFFERENT plane ditching in the water and gave them to the media, claiming they were of this crash, and apparently the media didn’t check out the genuineness of the photos...
Disproven.
>> Now why would Lang do that? Why would he post images of the area with no passengers or anything else in the water ANYWHERE, rather than taking photos of what was actually there and giving those to the media?
Obviously because Lang is evil. /s
Nobody was watching because they were told not to. All 5200 of them.
And they all kept their mouths shut.
>> If there was a helicopter there dropping low
If it was the third Tuesday after the first Friday after the full moon bringing in the summer solstice and the owl bopped the buzzard and the oriel
Enough with the fantasy. Enough!
butterdezillion wrote:
“Truth doesn’t stop just because it’s uncomfortable.”
Well said!
Keep asking those questions and poking holes in the “ official line”.
Now you understand how Butter does research, she keeps going until she finds the smallest anomoly and then calls it proof of a conspiracy. It’s how she was able to convince herself that Fudddy had “indirectly confirmed “ that there was something wrong with the BC, whereas to everyone sane except Butter she was saying there is nothing at all wrong with it. Almost all the silliness birthers believe has come from either Orly or Butter, who each in their own way are equally incompetent, and equally delusional. It’s extraordinary that it has taken this long for it to be revealed .
Negative. There are problems with the PDF/BC.
“If Lang was swooping up and down so low that Miller mistook it for a navy plane doing touch and goes, why didn’t it get on any of Puentes’ video?”
What makes you think Mark Miller witnessed the event or any part of the event?
There were extra people. They’re in Puentes’ video.
He said he did. But then he said a lot of things that weren’t true, according to the official reports. Didn’t he, zoltan? I wonder why. He was the one who took Fuddy to the airport; was he still there 2 minutes later when the plane crashed in full view?
My epistemology has been the same on all of my work. If I’m shoddy now then I was shoddy then. If I was faithful then I am faithful now.
It’s not a question of shoddy - you are very thorough, too thorough really because you expect everything to be perfect, and can’t accept a sngle anomaly. It’s coming to silly conclusions when the evidence doesn’t support it that is your problem, as with Orly and the Bounel nonsense. You did the same thing with Fuddy, but nobody called you on it at the time, so it became birther lore. You produced articles on it so long I swear not a single person read them to the end. I’ve spent the last 3 days reading them - it’s just thousands and thousands of words of drivel. You pulled evidence into the same pretzel you have here in order to announce she had indirecty confirmed the BC was fake. But here you won’t even say what your theory is, so how can anyone take it seriously? Was Fuddy murdered, abducted, what exactly are you suggesting happened?
I just looked at all of bing.com’s images for “kalaupapa”. The only photo I found of the airport and runway (besides one very old one) was at http://ts4.mm.bing.net/th?id=HN.608024527152746486&w=256&h=176&c=7&rs=1&pid=1.7 .
That’s where I looked. I scrolled all the way to the bottom and the link I posted was the only image that showed the runway.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.