There's a logistics problem with that. Armed deer hunters outnumber our military more than 20:1.
And if you think about it, all the military might the west could bring to bear didn't make that much difference in Afghanistan. The savages over there are still armed to the teeth.
/johnny
The rules of engagement have hampered our soldiers...they were put in place when it was discovered we were way too effective(especially for our numbers)! The fact is, the Liberal elites would have no issue relaxing the ROE’s on Americans...since we’re utter trash to them compared to the put upon indigenous populations of other lands...such as Afghanistan! Still, a good number of soldiers won’t engage despite what their upper officers tell them to do . Hence, I think the subjugation of Americans may well come from fewer military and government forces employing high tech means...some of that fabled weaponry that is 50 years beyond what we already see in place. Elites think they have everything under control, but they can’t plan for their own natural deaths, they never know when an Earthquake or volcano can open up to dash their plans. And they can’t know what a free people are planning when they are off grid. Sure they can do terrible damage and they do have nukes, but in the end they are humans too who defecate and have the same types of animal smells and lusts as regular folks. Their own hubris will destroy them!
IIRC, we have 750,000 hunters in PA alone and I believe Michigan is next with 700,000. They do not want to mess with our weapons. There is a gun behind every blade of grass.
Had the Obama adm been successful in it’s attempt to tie the TEA Party to the attempted car bombing in NYC, all the people associated with the TEA Party you know the people whose names the IRS had been gathering, would be on a terrorist watch list.
Just a thought for you.