Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obamalateral Disarmament - U.S. To Cut ICBM Squadron
Investor's Business Data ^ | November 22, 2013 | IBD EDITORIALS

Posted on 11/22/2013 6:22:04 AM PST by raptor22

Defense: Breaking yet another promise, this one to Congress, the administration jeopardizes our national security with plans to eliminate an entire squadron of intercontinental ballistic missiles and destroy its silos.

Yet another example of what President Obama meant in 2012 when he promised Russian President Dmitry Medvedev at the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, South Korea, that after his re-election he would have more "flexibility" on defense issues, comes on the news that an ICBM squadron would be scrapped to comply with the New START Treaty — even as both the Russians and Chinese deploy new ballistic missiles.

A document prepared by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and obtained by the Washington Free Beacon maps out a strategy to eliminate an ICBM squadron — and destroy its missile silos — by Dec. 5, 2017.

The military would begin removing ICBMs next October, after an environmental assessment is complete, and the silo elimination would begin in May 2016.

The fact is, as the Heritage Foundation notes, the U.S. does not need to eliminate an ICBM squadron to meet New START's limits. The State Department's Oct. 1 fact sheet says the U.S. must dismantle 109 of its deployed ICBMs, deployed submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs) and deployed heavy bombers, and remove another 138 warheads.

Heritage notes the U.S. has already reduced its deployed warheads by 112 and that destroying an ICBM squadron to comply with New START is unnecessary.

Further cuts, if needed, could be made by removing the missiles and placing the silos in reserve status.

The document says the reductions are necessary to "meet the New START Treaty compliance date by closing an ICBM squadron and eliminating the associated Launch Facilities." But that's not true. New START does not require destruction of the silos.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: appeasement; defense; disaemament; disarmament; ibd; ibddefense; icbms; newsrarttreaty; newstart; nuclear; obama; obamairantalks; obamalateral; putin; russia

1 posted on 11/22/2013 6:22:05 AM PST by raptor22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum; markomalley; Clairity; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; WL-law; Para-Ord.45; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


2 posted on 11/22/2013 6:23:29 AM PST by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

And why isn’t this Front Page news in the MSM?!


3 posted on 11/22/2013 6:27:53 AM PST by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
..

he is America's "own" covert Kamikaze!




4 posted on 11/22/2013 6:34:49 AM PST by MeshugeMikey ( Visit http://icantenroll.com/ In Glitch We Trust....;o})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Its not evidence, certainly, but in the documentary 2016 dinesh dsouza intimated his suspicion that a legacy ambition of Obama was unilateral US disarmament.

After the weekend I believe we will he seeing some amazing reports of a diastwr narrowly averted one month ago.

I mean a really huge one that only SOUNDS crazy.


5 posted on 11/22/2013 6:39:20 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

“to meet New START’s limits.”

WHO RATIFIED that TREATY??????

Anybody still believe Obama is not set on destroying America?


6 posted on 11/22/2013 6:40:51 AM PST by G Larry (Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

He’s got 3 years left and nothing to lose.


7 posted on 11/22/2013 6:45:41 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; granite; GreenFreeper; grjr21; I got the rope; IchBinEinBerliner; jaredt112; JayB; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


8 posted on 11/22/2013 6:51:20 AM PST by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
71 senators ratified the treaty. The NeoCons voted against ratification.

Look at the article again and notice that the issue originates at the NeoCon publication, Washington Free Beacon. Also notice how the article tries to link two separate things, the missile shield(2012) and START(2010)

The treaty covers warheads and delivery systems. So technically, it doesn't cover the silos. Why pay to maintain the silos? They will never be used again. The next START will further lower warheads and delivery systems.

9 posted on 11/22/2013 7:01:39 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
For alert force, for alert force, klaxon, klaxon, klaxon!


10 posted on 11/22/2013 7:37:42 AM PST by OwenKellogg (Fundamental transformation sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

We need Curtis LeMay back, or at least someone like him. I frankly don’t care if we have 30000 warheads again. Now we have a smaller standing army, navy and air force to what we had 40 years ago when we had a huge nuclear deterrent. Where is the deterrent now. BTW, the deterrent is just to stop an attack, it under pins our entire military posture and by extention our foreign policy. Does anyone except the simpleton Kenyan think that anyone cares if we rant and rave and waive our arms before the UN about something? No, they only care if they know that if it is an attack on our nation or national interests, we have, er had, the power to obliterate them. As someone said long ago, money (power) talks and BS walks.


11 posted on 11/22/2013 7:45:32 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

More Obama scorched earth. The people WILL be punished for rejecting ObamaCare.


12 posted on 11/22/2013 7:45:55 AM PST by headstamp 2 (What would Scooby do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

Where is the deterrent now?


$17 trillion in debt

20 million illegal aliens

40 million on food stamps

Miley Cyrus and Lady Gaga

.... Who would want to assume control of this mess?

But I agree, as an old SAC trained killer, it seems to me that we’ve pissed it away.


13 posted on 11/22/2013 7:57:32 AM PST by OwenKellogg (Fundamental transformation sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

Yup we did. It was the “peace dividend”. This one was a dividend paid with borrowed funds!

See today in the Kenyan’s eyes, we were a force for ill will in the world because we were head and shoulders more powerful, militarily and economically, then other countries. He has taken down both so now we are removed from the playing field.


14 posted on 11/22/2013 8:01:40 AM PST by Mouton (The insurrection laws perpetuate what we have for a government now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking; StopGlobalWhining; Straight Vermonter; Tampa Caver; TChris; ...

IBD EDITORIAL PING


15 posted on 11/22/2013 8:07:14 AM PST by raptor22 (Visit my blog at True Conservatives on Twitter: http://t.co/IKpP3cwq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

Watching the destruction of our freedom, our Constitution, and our future, ya think?


16 posted on 11/22/2013 8:15:58 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Maybe that’s one of the things he told his liberal journalist lackeys in their meeting. Cover for me on obamacare AND the nuke deal.

Juan Williams should be fired from Fox. He used to spout the party line as expected. Now it’s obvious he’ll be saying what the white house tells him to say. Fox should not give obama a platform.


17 posted on 11/22/2013 8:29:34 AM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: raptor22
Well, now, that just might explain the ongoing purge of missile forces personnel. Those I have known who served took pride in their posting, and their readiness state.
18 posted on 11/22/2013 8:34:20 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

predictable


19 posted on 11/22/2013 11:51:27 AM PST by GOPJ ("Knockout game' - newest reason NO OTHER RACIAL group wants to live near blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raptor22

I know I don’t post here much anymore/lately — I’ve started reading other, non-political sites much of the time, due to trolls, and the concentrated utter incompetence / backstabbing of the GOPe, I’ve gotten discouraged.

But I still lurk here upon a time.

Thanks for remembering me, and including me in your *PING*s.

I *do* appreciate it.
g_w


20 posted on 11/23/2013 7:05:29 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson