Walt was a drug dealer, he deserved to die and deserves no accolades at all. May his character rot in hell.
How is that for having an absolute moral compass like the article praises walt for having?
The worst #TeamWalt justification ever.
He was a murderous drug producer who left his wife a widow, his baby daughter without a father and his teen aged son living the rest of his life in shame. He completely deserved his death.
Makes some interesting points.
I have about 20 middle episodes to catch up on.
This little write-up explains a bit that I have missed, like Hank and Marie’s illegal tendancies.
The series creator was interviewed last night. He is a devotee to Rod Serling’s “Twilight Zone”. That explains his style. Make the audience expect the ordinary and give them a complete surprise.
Every month people would get their script for Desoxyn or Biphetamine 20 or whatever. These were blue collar people doing what they needed to get back into the plants (This was Detroit) and perform at their best.
Then the DEA ruled that weight loss was no longer valid for prescribing amphetamines.
So it went underground.
The law of unintended consequences is a law after all.
Gosh, who knew. Idiots.
Walt’s dead, Jim.
“Walt did indeed leave money for his family...”
Very doubtful. His former partners aren’t going to launder $9M to give to his family. Skinny Pete or Badger is going to call them and tell them the lasers were a rouse after he finds out Walt is dead. The Feds are going to get the money.
Re: “But Walt did indeed leave money for his family.”
This part of the premise indicates that the writers - and viewers - are completely unfamiliar with the job benefits of being a government union employee.
Walt’s financial fears for his family were completely absurd.
I’ll guess his pay was in the $65,000 range.
His health care costs would be completely covered.
When he became too sick to work, his disability pay would essentially be the same as his normal paycheck.
His union contract provides an automatic life insurance policy - probably $250,000.
He would have the option - even after being diagnosed with a terminal illness - of buying an extra $50,000 of life insurance each year.
If he lives for 3 years, that provides a $400,000 tax free policy for his family, which would pay off his mortgage.
When he dies, his wife would receive his retirement pay plus health coverage for the rest of her life - at least $3,000 a month.
His children would receive special supplemental funding plus health care - I don’t know how much - until they become 22.
Since his oldest son is disabled, he would probably receive supplemental funding and health care for life.
His kids could attend a good public university simply with student loans and by working summers.
His wife, as a widowed mother of two, could get essentially free job training education for several years.
If she wants to be a stay-at-home Mom, then, most likely, the family would have to be careful about money and cut out some of the things they got used to when Walt was working full time, but NOTHING essential.
Also - the $9 million Trust that the “Gray Matter” folks are supposed to set up for Walt’s disabled son is problematic, to say the least.
They will have to commit multiple felonies to launder the cash, since large amounts of cash are completely USELESS in America unless you are buying or selling illegal goods, or buying legal goods from criminals who commit bank fraud and tax fraud.
Walt’s suicide showed everyone the biggest difference between him and his equally monstrous associate, Jesse. We see Walt accept responsibility for his evil and the perpetually whining Jesse not having nor willing to accept responsibility for anything.
Jesse was the most repulsive character on the show.
It looks like what you're doing is turning the whole G-man idea on its head. Instead of the government whitewashing its crimes because of its "good intentions," you're saying that the private enterprise crook and sociopath is justified because of his rigorous code. It's the same utilitarian or greater good justification of immoral acts turned upside-down.
If this were some college essay assignment on writing from a provided point of view I could see the reason. I have postulated in my head that "journalism" school must include crap like this to help inculcate those who still have any sense.
So then... I can come up for reasons this "essay" exists. What I can't figure out: why is it posted here?