Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rides3
No. Read the law, Jeff, this time much more carefully:

Yes, I've read it, Rides. Believe me, I've read it very carefully.

And there is absolutely nothing in those laws that in any way says that there exists such a thing as a native born citizen that isn't also a natural born citizen.

I think you need to read it carefully again.

177 posted on 08/28/2013 2:00:56 PM PDT by Jeff Winston (Yeah, I think I could go with Cruz in 2016.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston

Jeff, you’re purposely ignoring the fact that NATIVE-born citizen is further broken down by USCIS as EITHER native-born citizen OR natural-born citizen, WHICHEVER status existed prior to the loss of citizenship.

Read it again:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3059469/posts?q=1&;page=179#174

I realize you’re frustrated because the facts directly contradict your wishful thinking, but you’re making yourself look really foolish by pretending that what’s clearly written in black and white AND published by the USCIS as late as 2013, isn’t there.

Give up. You’re wrong.


181 posted on 08/28/2013 2:13:14 PM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson