WOW.. I stumbled onto this article and now I know why I got a funny feeling when I read about the DECRIMINALIZATION OF ‘Falsely representing or knowingly using a Social Security Number obtained with false information’ IN THIS BILL.. Why on Earth would such a crime be decriminalized? It's very plausible to me that buried within this Bill are laws which would render 0bama cleared on his alleged forged bc, and forged selective service card, and clear him of any wrongdoing for using other people's social security numbers, namely Harrison J. Bounel's.. Think about it!
"In the immigration bill is language which would DECRIMINALIZE…
‘Falsely representing or knowingly using a Social Security Number obtained with false information’
‘Falsely claiming citizenship on Form I-9′
‘Knowingly altering a Social Security Card’
‘Document fraud to prove eligibility for employment’"
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Ooops. I think I forgot to check the ‘excerpt’ box for this post.. Please read ENTIRE article at link. Very interesting perspective on favors for 0bama hidden within this Bill.
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Very interesting. Thank you for posting.
4 posted on
06/28/2013 12:01:20 PM PDT by
Piranha
(We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst.)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Since this was buried deep in the bill, it is a good explanation as to why they had to vote on it without reading it.
To: LucyT
6 posted on
06/28/2013 12:15:26 PM PDT by
stephenjohnbanker
(The RINO/amnesty argument goes like this: 1) If we pander to Hispanics, we will save the GOP, at le)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
I would say Boehner has Obama’s balls in his hands...
11 posted on
06/28/2013 12:33:58 PM PDT by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
A lot of hidden stuff can be put in this 1,000 plus page Senate bill that very few have read.
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
"Those “republicans” supporting this Senate Immigration Reform bill are desperately trying to avoid a Constitutional crisis in the hopes of never having to grow a set of balls."Couldn't agree more.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
13 posted on
06/28/2013 12:47:21 PM PDT by
wku man
(Amnesty? No Way, Jose (No Se Puede!) by 10 Pound Test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTUQ8yOI2c)
15 posted on
06/28/2013 4:06:22 PM PDT by
phockthis
(http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index.htm ...)
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; Jet Jaguar; Lady Jag; Slings and Arrows; null and void; maggief; Dog; ...
16 posted on
06/28/2013 9:04:48 PM PDT by
bitt
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Oh this is definitely an attempt to cover for Dear Reader but no CONSTITUTIONAL law can be written that will make the USURPER LEGAL.
Even if they were to pass a law that would decriminalized past identity fraud, Obama is in a class by himself.
Only one office requires a NBC. And there is only one way to change that (by two different processes) by a CONSTITUTIONAL Amendment.
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
The republicans should simply add an amendment to this that exempts it from applying SPECIFICALLY to anyone claiming the name of Barrack Hussein Obama and claims to be President of the United States of America as well as anyone else who may have enabled any false representations thereof.
They've told us he is legal all this time. This exemption should be no problem if he is legal so they have nothing to fear.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson