Your No. 10 is incorrect. That was objection withdrawn, not overruled. It’s one of the stains on Obama’s record and it’s the one objection that shifted the burden of proof, and proved that the legal precedent does NOT support any notion that Obama is eligible for office. If the Arizona citation you gave earlier was seen as compelling, then that objection would have been immediately denied. It wasn’t.
From the Wichita Eagle:
‘I have no doubts now,’ Kobach says of Obama’s birthplace
By BRENT D. WISTROM
Eagle Topeka bureau
Published Monday, Sep. 17, 2012
TOPEKA – It was all over but the shouting.
After the State Objections Board somewhat clumsily disposed Monday of a Manhattan Republican’s claim that President Barack Obama shouldn’t qualify to be on Kansas ballots, advocates for and against Obama verbally clashed inside and outside of Memorial Hall, which houses the offices of Secretary of State Kris Kobach and Attorney General Derek Schmidt.
[excerpt]
http://www.kansas.com/2012/09/17/2492998/kansas-expects-to-end-challenge.html#storylink=cpy