No judge or justice has concurred with your interpretation over the last 115 years.
From a Reagan-appointed Judge: Taitz v Obama (Quo Warranto) “This is one of several such suits filed by Ms. Taitz in her quixotic attempt to prove that President Obama is not a natural born citizen, as is required by the Constitution. This Court is not willing to go tilting at windmills with her.”— Chief US District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth, US District Court for the District of Columbia, April 14, 2010
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30040084/TAITZ-v-OBAMA-QW-23-MEMORANDUM-OPINION-dcd-04502943496-23-0
No judge or justice has concurred with your interpretation over the last 115 years.Has anyone brought Gray's limiting statement ruling in U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark to their attention?
Cite where a judge has discussed that even though Gray tells us that the effect of the ruling is limited to the question presented to the court and the agreed upon facts, that they have the authority to ignore the limitations Gray specifically sets.