Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Rides3

“Obama doesn’t meet the conditions of the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark ruling, and he doesn’t meet the 14th Amendment’s “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement as defined by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Trumbull in the Congressional Record.”

That may be your opinion, but until you get a court to agree with you, that’s all it is.

The understanding of everyone in Congress is that Obama is eligible, just as everyone in Congress agreed that ObamaCare was the law until the courts ruled on it. You may be right and you may be wrong, until the SCOTUS says you are right, the lower court rulings make the case law.

You will see those same lower court cases cited, if Senator Rubio or Governor Jindal runs in the future and someone challenges them.


399 posted on 04/04/2013 5:10:12 PM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies ]


To: 4Zoltan
That may be your opinion, but until you get a court to agree with you, that’s all it is.

It's not an opinion. It's a fact. We've all seen a digital image of Obama's father's actual 1961 "APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME OF TEMPORARY STAY."

403 posted on 04/04/2013 5:18:05 PM PDT by Rides3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson