So we have an official court decision in which the court says they have CAREFULLY considered the birther "natural born citizen" arguments, and they are "without sufficient merit to warrant discussion in a written opinion."
Was the case decided upon the fact that Obama meets neither the facts of the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark decision nor the 14th Amendment “subject to the jurisdiction” requirement as defined in the Congressional Record?
On what do they base their ruling exclusive of WKA or its derivatives or the 14th Amendment?