Has a case on Obama's father's lack of permanent domicile in the U.S. as required by the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark ruling ever been tried?
Obama’s mother and his grandparents with whom he lived were permanently domiciled by any standard.
I'll refer you again to the U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark ruling:
"The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative."Obama's non-citizen parent must have been permanently domiciled in the U.S. for the ruling to apply to Obama. Obama's father was never permanently domiciled in the U.S. There is actual evidence that proves he was only in the U.S. on a temporary basis.
The problem with your analysis is that the WKA decision doesn't state "permanently domiciled" as a requirement, only as part of the description of the case. You might as well say the decision doesn't apply to anyone who's not of Chinese descent.