No, it’s about whether the SoS has a duty to check the eligibility of presidential candidates, especially if fraud is alleged. If the SoS has no such duty, that’s the end of the issue.
And Obama is the heart of the example in the appeal.
The lower court ruling stated, "If the Secretary of State has knowledge gained from an official source arising from the performance of duties prescribed by law, that a candidate has not met a certifying qualification...the Secretary of State should not certify the candidate." What official source has ever stated Obama was not qualified in any manner? None, that's the problem.