Disagree. A ruling of ineligibility from Alabama and the forensics evidence can be utilized by other states in similar suits culminating as a 2014 campaign issue for midterm elections.
Pressure can mount for the House to appoint a special prosecutor who can subpoena Hawaii and can investigate Obama who is already implicated in fraud.
You have a good point, as promotion of the issue for 2014 could in theory result in election of super-super-majority in Congress that would be capable of sustaining an impeachment.
That of course presumes voter attention and interest.
But with the Soros groups financing the BO “message machine” and its corruption of the voting system, including the prospect of up to 11 million new citizens being motivated to exploit “same day registration” by then, will it matter?
True enough, but the pressure has been out there for awhile and the House has done nothing. This is a political hot potato and the spineless 'Pubbies are not interested in another Bill Clinton-style impeachment stalemate.
What you point to, i.e. the collateral possibilities, is why it will be very important for Obama and his enablers to quash any negatives in the Alabama case. You can bet the White House that they are working to do such right at this moment.