The Immigration and Naturalization Service Officer who reviewed Obama Senior’s application for an extended stay on August 31, 1961 wrote that Senior had a US citizen wife (USC) and a son born on 8/4/61 in Honolulu named Barack Obama, II.
http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/07/INS-6.jpg
So at least three weeks after his alleged birth, he was known as Barack Obama, II.
If and I repeat IF he was born in Honolulu on August 4, 1961, those other questions are interesting and enquiring minds would like to know, but they have no bearing on Article 2/Section 1 eligibility. We’ve had adopted presidents before with different birth names (Leslie Lynch King and William Jefferson Blythe) and minors can’t lose US citizenship through the actions of their parents or guardians.
That’s all well and good; however, there’s enough recent, circumstantial evidence pointing to a Kenyan birth that the topic deserves a thorough investigation. Obama’s own publisher was claiming Kenyan birth for Obama up until he started his Presidential run!
Clearly, Barack Obama either was born in Kenya and lied about being born in Hawaii, or he was born in Hawaii but lied and said he born in Kenya. I believe it is the latter, but the truth needs to come out, whichever way it may go.
I am not sure the authenticity of that memo. Any handwritten memos that ‘collaborate’ the narrative are suspect as it is known that all FOIA requests are going through WH reviewers who are tasked with supporting the narrative and updating information in FOIA request before they go out.
But anything is possible at this point.
How convenient, that the NSO just happened to include the baby’s full name, Barack Obama, II. What, no middle name? Just BO2? Too much info & not enough at the same time; quite a feat.
Odd, isn’t it, that BHO Sr. didn’t know how to spell his own name. His name was ‘Barrack’, two ‘r’s. But his namesake child, ‘BHOII’, has only one ‘r’. Hate to break it, but this makes the baby [supposing all this is true and accurate] Barack Hussein Obama The First. Can’t be ‘The Second’ unless the name is the same; even clueless people know that.
Notice, too, that IF this record is the original and untampered form, we must now decide which of two pathological liars was telling the truth. BHO Sr wanted to stay in HI. If Granny Dunham had already registered Little Barry’s birth as occurring on Honolulu, it would certainly be in BHO Sr’s best interest to further the narrative. BUT, that does not explain the missing wk of foreign arrivals in the National Archive record, that just happens—purely coincidentally, no doubt—to include Aug 4, ‘61. If the birth happened in HI & all was standard & aboveboard, why the need to expunge a wk of National Archive records PRIOR to Zullo having a look at it??? Something is not adding up.
So BHO Sr had a reason to support Granny Dunham’s paperwork, but what reason had BHO ‘II’ to lie to his own literary agency??? He must have known that if he were really born in HI, the truth would come out. Why taint himself w his own publishers as such a liar that he couldn’t tell the truth about the place of his birth?
Well maybe for once BHO ‘II’ was telling the truth. Maybe at that point in his life he was too proud of his Kenyan birth to keep it under wraps. Ayers hadn’t yet smacked him around on the subject, and certainly BHO ‘II’ wasn’t educated enough to know he was blowing his POTUS chances. Odds are he proudly told a truth he cherished...only later to be witch-slapped by Ayers and forced to revert to the lie/manufactured HI birth.
Seen likelier than positing that BHO Sr didn’t even know how to spell his own name, doesn’t it?
