Replies

Really?

1961 is not when the records were likely reworked. Try 1971.

But in any case Okubo has said - we can not say what that is an image of...referring to the images posted by Democratic operative blogs (include Fact Check). So she clearly KNOWS the image is not that of an official Hawaii-issued document. If she KNOWS this she has a duty and responsibility to report it.

Fast forward to 2011. Fuddy gives records to someone, somehow in the Obama camp AND writes a cover letter. In all likelihood the the records are swapped out and but the cover letter is used with the clearly digitially created LFBC - not the records provided by Hawaii. Now Fuddy’s name and position are openly and obviously being used to commit fraud. She does nothing. She has exposed herself and her department to potential criminal and civil action if the LFBC is not the document(s) she gave the Obama team.

Yes, they are culpable. Yes, they are exposed. But it is good to see someone has thought it through enough to have a defense when the music stops and the chairs are not there. Okuba and Fuddy in pink in the Arizona desert - there is a sight.

Notice that Brian Schatz was the smart one. He would not sign the OCON in 2008 declaring Obama a natural born Citizen. His actions are very telling. He is trying keep his options open when the music stops. He will let Nancy swing for declaring Obama Constitutionally Eligible.

What do you think was reworked in 1971? There are pre-1971 corroborations of the 1961 birth date and birth place: the 1961 birth index of all Hawaii births, the August 13 & 14, 1961 Honolulu newspaper birth announcements, the 1964 Dunham-Obama divorce decree, the 1967 US State Department interview with Lolo Soetoro, and the 1968 Jakarta, Indonesia Santo Fransiskus Asisi Catholic School application.
I still believe that if there was fraud, it goes back to the very beginning. Why else would Barack Obama Senior be acknowledging paternity and naming birth place and birth date just three weeks after the alleged birth?