Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lionheartusa1
Looking in to that. Here is the Judge's ruling on standing, referring to the other over 100? cases that have been filed seeking Obama’s valid ID “Most were dismissed on standing grounds; a question not directly at issue in this case because plaintiff purports to bring this case under RCW 29A.68.011, subparts 1 and 3, which confers standing on any elector.”

“purports” shows the reluctance on his part. Plaintiff did without question file the suit using the RCW in question. Very few cases have acknowledged the plaintiff as having standing.

26 posted on 01/28/2013 12:32:36 PM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: ethical

That doesn’t say she had standing, that said that the issue of standing was irrelevant — I’d have to see more full context to understand exactly why the case was dismissed. It’s patently ludicrous to assert the the judge declared she had standing and then fined her for filing a frivolous suit, though.


31 posted on 01/28/2013 12:42:05 PM PST by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson