Replies

Sounds like the RNC knows the judges have all been threatened.

Maybe because the leadership of the RNC has also been threatened...

If so, though, they know that they won’t be able to do anything “on the issues” either. The same threat that stops everybody on eligibility can stop them on anything. That’s what Glenn Beck found out at Fox. First he was told he couldn’t allow anybody to speak about eligibility, and then when it couldn’t be avoided any more he was presumably told he had to mock the “birthers”. And he did as he was told, focusing instead on other issues like Obama’s connections with Soros and Soros’ connections with both the Muslims and communists. Eventually they threatened his secretary’s life so constantly that he decided he couldn’t in good conscience keep talking about those things on Fox because he was jeopardizing her life. So he left Fox. The only way he could talk about the things that matter is if he was independent. Like Breitbart was independent. Note the “was”.

But I can tell him right now that being independent doesn’t do it either, unless you also do your own distribution, because the 2 leading radio distribution companies were also threatened. Ruh’s EIB Network is independent, but because he depends on Clear Channel to distribute his program, he can’t say whatever he wants either - not if he wants to continue in the business.

Appeasing a tyrant on this one - tee hee - silly, unimportant, nut-job - issue basically tells everybody that you’re for sale, and simply haggling over the price. They’ll up the price whenever they want as long as they have you over a barrel.

And Soros’ communist-Islamist alliance has the judges, RNC, and Congress over a barrel. I believe it is a threat of another run on the bank to collapse the US economy.

Did it sound to you like the RNC was calling the lawsuits stupid, or was saying that there was no will to uphold the law, or what? Were they acting like the “birthers” are the problem, or like the judges are the problem?