It's possible that there is a remaining burden of proof. There is a paper artifact in HI to which they are referring. We do not completely know what is on it. But enough of the essential info has been verified to say there is a piece of 1961 paper saying Obama was born there. It may have contrary info on it or a stamp on top of it saying invalid or other possibilities. But the paper exists, was photocopied, sealed, delivered, scanned at the WH, manipulated and released.
NO BIRTH FACTS have been verified. The record itself is legally as valuable as a $3 bill. Hawaii statute considers it no different than if there was no record at all.