Posted on 12/22/2012 5:25:09 AM PST by iontheball
A real-life Florida judge has paraphrased a statement from the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper in Miracle on 34th Street to justify his sudden decision to dismiss a challenge under state law to Barack Obamas eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.
The ruling from Kevin Carroll of the Florida circuit court for Leon County dismissed the case brought on behalf of Democratic voter Michael C. Voeltz, who raised the issue of Obamas qualifications under a state law that allows voters to challenge candidates eligibility.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/12/eligibility-judge-quotes-famous-santa-case/#dZP0l2yoB6TbO7Rs.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
And this was the plaintiff's third bite at the apple. Almost gives Orly Taitz a run for her money.Plaintiff's remedy, if there is any, (and this Court does not suggest there is) lies with Congress pursuant to Title 3 U.S.C. [Section] 15. See also Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144, 1147 (N.D. Cal. 2008)(concluding that issues regarding Presidential qualification are committed to the Congress).
Judicial insanity.
The Obama admin makes its legal ground from cartoons and childrens movies. What else is new?
In conclusion, this Court finds that notwithstanding section 102.168, this Circuit Court of the Second Judicial Circuit, in and for Leon County, Florida does not have jurisdiction to determine the issue of qualification for the Office of the President of the United States, particularly at this late date in the process. In accordance with Florida Statute 103.061, the Florida electors to the the Electoral College met and voted on December 17, 2012. Consistent with the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution, this Court cannot now alter the Electoral College process. [] Because the Court finds that Plaintiff cannot amend his complaint to cure this jurisdictional issue, the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
It's notable that before the election the judge said the plaintiff had to wait until after the election to have standing to make the case. Now that it's after the election, it's "too late". It appears that the judge is at least mature enough to be able to watch "Miracle on 34th Street", but he's either too ignorant, or too stupid to comprehend "Alice and Wonderland".
I think it was two different judges. (I suppose I should read the second, 19-page order).
Queen of Hearts:
"Off with his head!"
I, too. However, I find it too tiring to waste my time reading the ramblings of juvenile ignorants.
whassup w/the world wide cable tv special over the eligibility ssue, hosted by the VIP?
whassup w/the world wide cable tv special over the eligibility ssue, hosted by the VIP?
Wonder how much this judges bribe from Obama was?
With the two contradictory rulings in Florida courts...this will be grounds for appeal. You cannot have one judge telling a plaintiff to “wait after the election” then tell another plaintiff after the election “you have no standing”
Contrary to this judges ruling....each state runs their own elections....even the ones for President...and determine how votes are cast and tabulated. Note that we have many different types of voting “machines” and methods used throughout the United States for voting...including for the office of President.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.