Posted on 08/15/2012 10:28:47 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
What a loser.! Abby Dees. This is your LIFE????????????? Wow. What a waste.
...is to tell. This nitwit has the same trouble with verbs as Zero.
We now have Chick-fil-A Wednesdays...yahoo!
I was pulling up to the local CFA yesterday and the kids were screaming “no daddy, please not again” and since the line was longer than usual, we decided to go back home and grill some hot dogs.
They got their collective butts handed to them in an overpowering display of support of a Christian taking a public stand against their perverse behavior.
And now comes the, "Oh, well. It wasn't that big of a deal anyway."
Yeah. Right.
It's like a #1 ranked team getting hammered in a title game and then saying, "Didn't matter."
If it wasn't that important, why the temper tantrum?
If it wasn't that big of a deal, why the Homo-Kiss-in(where miniscule numbers participated)to show how mighty is the homosexual community?
If it wasn't that important, then why double down on showing your insignificance?
Pathetic mewling of a pervert.
And you can bet your sweet bippy that if the homosexuals had shown up in as large numbers as the news media was there to cover, this entire column would be one of infinite gloating.
She should just go to JC Penney's and tell her story to ALL those customers who must be outfitted in camo since they can't be seen.
>>What does “why 2” mean?<<
Sorry, I popped that off a little quickly.
We know that traditional marriage is one man and one woman — it is the bedrock of the nuclear family and thus the bedrock of society. All our laws and mores reflect this certainty.
“Why 2?” for gays means just that. There is no biological imperative so there sis no meaning at all to the number of people in a “marriage” relationship.
There is no meaning to gay “marriage” — by allowing it e redefine marriage as “2 to n people of any gender or sex in a legal contact.” It includes siblings and other incestuous relationships.
“Why 2” is the defining question on why gays are destroying the concept of marriage. I can explain why a man and a woman create a union based on many thousands of year of human interaction. Gay “marriage” is just arbitrary assemblage.
Yes, “why 2” is a devastating argument.
Could you have voiced your point a little more strongly, Mark? You were way too nice.
Seriously, excellent post. And much more can be said about the demonic, murderous nature of the homosexual Left.
The comments are priceless.
This guy ain’t happy, either:
Sentence GLAAD to a pit of Chick-fil-A
http://www.pridesource.com/article.html?article=55157
You have this absolutely right. Propagandists know that "he who controls the language controls the argument, and he who controls the argument controls the people."
Something that conservatives have allowed leftists to get away with is redefining the language. "Hate" used to mean something very different than the leftists have been forcing down our throats for some time now. "Hate" is now defined as anything with which the left disagrees. In the eyes of most leftists, traditional Christians and Jews are no different than Klansmen. And this is supported by groups like the SPLC, but then they've morphed into nothing more than a hard-core leftist mouth-piece, no different than the ADL or the NAACP.
The left needs to be slapped down ASAP, before they bastardize the language any further, and their redefinition of the language needs to be rolled back.
Mark
“Those who control the language control minds.” Ayn Rand
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.