Oh yeah, my bad, I forgot you’re the cold fusion dude.
You’ll believe pretty much any goofy thing without critical analysis, and you sling around vacuous “arguments” like a short order cook slings hash.
Carry on.
Oh yeah, my bad, I forgot you’re the cold fusion dude.
You’ll believe pretty much any goofy thing without critical analysis, and you sling around vacuous “arguments” like a short order cook slings hash.
***Fascinating. You’ve heard of National Instruments, haven’t you? They recently concluded that with so much evidence of anomalous heat generation...
http://www.22passi.it/downloads/eu_brussels_june_20_2012_concezzi.pdf
Conclusion
• There is an unknown physical event and there
is a need of better measurements and control
tools. NI is playing a role in accelerating
innovation and discovery.
Now, I don’t know much about you but it’s easy to guess that the guys who wrote that know more about science, test & measurement, and physical events than YOU do. They know more than I do. And these anamolous heat generation events have been examined by guys with Nobel Prizes. So, where is the lack of critical analysis?
You’re the one with vacuous arguments here.