Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: trailhkr1
Are you serious?

Why did no-one in that cinema have a gun?

Fun fact which will be discovered at trial: it wasn't Jamie Holmes who prevented a huge crowd of Americans from being able to defend themselves. It was Cinemark.

We can discuss ballistic kevlar until we're blue in the face but the plain fact is that the shooter didn't need body armor. Cinemark disarmed his targets.

13 posted on 07/20/2012 2:37:05 PM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra

Yes, those ‘gun-free zones’ really stop these crazed shooters!


15 posted on 07/20/2012 2:45:50 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra

Exactly... The “gun free zone” policy made it a shooting gallery.


24 posted on 07/20/2012 7:24:21 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson