Now we get to the nitty gritty, the dirty deed rears its ugly head as I suspected it eventually must. I'll not refer to it again or name the guilty party. Private Mail discussions with someone who offered to keep a record of research materials and source links were meant to remain private and not be circulated to over a hundred people on a pinglist, with the researchers names still attached.
And that is what you are beating me over the head with, you disgusting scumbag. If there's anyone who is incoherent as you stated in a pervious comment, it's the person who sent out a missive of disjointed information collected at random from material that was meant to be saved off-site until such time as further information was available. If the result of this episode is that you manage to have me removed from FR as a contributor, I shall remind you, if that happens, I'll take it as a compliment. As it stands, there are two of you DEAD to me. Got that?
Since I have withdrawn my small, but game dog from this fight, can I have some feedback on Sheriff Joe's latest round of revelations? I need to know if, IYHO, I am daft for putting all of my short-term mental efforts into this particular, rather limited basket. That is I feel the most productive use of my time is trying to bring awareness of the forgery, or to be kind, "the modification" of the material Obama got from HI, before posting on his WH website.
By the cold light of dawn, I fear that Obama will be long gone as the plot unravels. So, it's really not about HIM after all. It's about preserving the Constitutional route to the Presidency and establishing once and for all clear and constitutional guidelines. Our founders, au fond 18th C. Christian gentlemen, never anticipated attacks on the system by Communist thugs and a sharp-looking but rather dumb teleprompter jockey from God knows what or where.
“I’ll not refer to it again or name the guilty party. Private Mail discussions with someone who offered to keep a record of research materials and source links were meant to remain private and not be circulated to over a hundred people on a pinglist, with the researchers names still attached.”
You know very well that David and you together in context were the first, to my knowledge, to post a clear exposure of Valerie Sarruf as your claimed mother of BHO II on a public FR thread.
My comment #631 on this thread includes links to the posts where you and David did this:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2908395/posts?page=631#631
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2904263/replies?c=212
Sarruf
—Fuad Sarruf (~1900-)
—m. (1928) Lily Zelpha Majdalany (1903-1998)
——Valerie Zelpha Helen Sarruf (1940-)
—Lorice Sarruf (1907-1991)
—m. Philippe Elias Toutonghi (1899-2000)
ALL ROADS LEAD TO THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT
212 posted on 07/09/2012 5:37:37 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2904263/replies?c=273
And, Lorice, as you say, first cousin to Faud, is first cousin once removed to Faud’s daughter Valerie; and is thus first counsin twice removed to Fauds grandson by daughter Valerie and we all know who he is.
273 posted on 07/10/2012 7:40:02 AM PDT by David
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/2904263/replies?c=294
To: David
...And, Lorice, as you say, first cousin to Faud, is first cousin once removed to Faud’s daughter Valerie; and is thus first counsin twice removed to Fauds grandson by daughter Valerie and we all know who he is.
Look at this, I found an image of that Valerie, she played a part in a TV series named The Avengers in the UK in an episode from the 1962-1963 series:
294 posted on 07/10/2012 3:14:22 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)