Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

lol, I’m not confused.

Here’s another example, just for kicks.

Several posters on this thread are claiming they won’t vote for Romney based on their principles....they cannot vote for someone they think is pro-choice, or somehing else. (I’m generalizing here). I call you guys the conscientious objectors in this battle. Fine. There will always be some. Buuuuuut, if we were all conscientious objectors we’d get creamed in each and every battle. Some of us have to get bloody and fight by actually voting...not “not voting”. It would help to have more of us than them (liberals) in this battle. We’ve got a long ways to go in this war, but first we have to win THIS battle.


228 posted on 07/16/2012 8:24:36 PM PDT by Girlene (pardon me, II've got the vapors....I might get confused...where is my powder...sigh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies ]


To: Girlene
So, girl, what are you guys going to call yourselves after the election?

Because you can't call yourself conservative if you are willing to approve of slavery (you did, upthread, to get what you wanted), or killing babies in the womb.

/johnny

230 posted on 07/16/2012 8:31:16 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: Girlene

Dumb analogy. You obviously don’t know the difference between conscientious objectors and fighters who refuse to be quislings.


239 posted on 07/16/2012 8:57:14 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Nutritionally, you are what you eat. Politically, you are what you support.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson