“You would have a really good point if ...”
No, I just have a really fine point. The article is ridiculous.
IF Romney put race and gay rights on the same level (which he didn’t, the mere list in a sentence doesn’t turn apples into oranges) then the level he put them on is that on both race and sexual orientation he OPPOSES the agenda of the left. Period.
How can the author miss the fact that he was in front of a left wing race group, which BOOED him. They didn’t get on their chairs and cheer.
Read the above lines again. They're from the article. They are eminently sensible. It's like saying "self-defense, family in danger, and personal whim confront us when we decide to pull the trigger."
You have put on the level of acceptability an item that shouldn't be there.
In what universe have you been living?
Romney supports the homosexual agenda, abortion, man made global warming, government mandates, government health care, gun grabs, higher taxes IE those 1%ers, just to name a few LEFT agenda items.