I promise to cut taxes for the rich, and use the poor as a cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel.
I’m not surprised: Just weeks ago, Romney came out in favor of Gay Couples, and believe it or not said that at the state level Gays should be allowed to adopt children.
I noticed that in his speech also.
Once again, Mitten’s persistent drive to say anything to please everyone overcomes what otherwise was an excellent speech.
Yup, he’s still a vapid dork.
But...a vapid dork is better than the opposition...a sleezy, lying, unachieving, undocumented vapid dork.
Excellent point.
Every sexual orientation covers a lot of territory. Try to be more careful Mitt.
I noticed that too and I don’t like it at all. However, I will still vote for him to get rid of Obama.
The House and Senate (hopefully) can restore and strengthen DOMA.
I guess he felt it was important enough to say what he did...besides, if you want Obama out, he’s the only chance.
Black pastors to protest NAACP support for gay marriage:
It was totally unnecessary.
Won’t gain ANY votes.
WILL lose votes.
It was the only part of the speech that was pandering!
How in the name of all that’s holy could we, in this once great country, come down to a choice between a flaming Marxist and this? Makes me want to puke.
Sexual perversion is a BEHAVIOR, an unnatural one at that, NOT an ancestry or religious faith.
“Romney just undercut the rational and philosophical basis for opposition to same sex marriage. It also played right into the hands of supporters of the radical homosexual agenda.”
His statements could also have been the cause of the reaction of the crowd(booing). Remember most Blacks are not supportive of homosexual rights, and in no way view the issue as a rights issue.
This is a good example of how the Romney apologists are more concerned about getting Conservatives to vote for him than Romney is himself. He couldn’t care less if we vote for him, otherwise he wouldn’t be saying stuff like this.
You know, Romney went there and confronted the NAACP, told them Obama sucks, and got booed.
Then you have conservatives take one friggin sentence and come up with a whole article about how that one phrase yad yada yada....
It’s a bit ridiculous.
Can we apply an ounce of logic? Saying you will represent all people does NOT say you support their agenda.
Romney does not support teh NAACP agenda, he got booed, but he still told them he will represent “all races.”
Saying he will represent gay people doesn’t equal support for gay marriage,etc. Any more than he is on the NAACP’s side on Obamacare or voter ID laws.
That is, one who actively (and politically) supports the radical homosexual-rights movement.
On the cultural front, radical homosexualism and Christian principle & morality are incompatible. They cannot co-exist.
Romney has made his bed; his position on this issue is clear.
He is my enemy.
I promise to cut taxes for the rich, and use the poor as a cheap source of teeth for aquarium gravel.
I think Mitt will do a fine job of representing homosexuals.
I saw that. I said to the wife - “Now THAT’s the wrong thing to mention THERE! Obama’s love affair with the fags is turning off his black base, and Romney says this to them! What a dumbass!”
Do the also wonder about the Pope's religious affiliation or where bears defecate?
I thought he was referring to man or (war on) woman. Silly me. I’m not deep enough. LOL!
I think one can "represent" another without enabling them. Of course it doesn't hurt to let them think you might....