Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Norm Lenhart
Your attempts to say that Romney is a liberal, and therefore is the same as Bambi are simply wrong. I'm no Romney fan, but that's just flat out fatuous.

What you are seemingly saying is that you (and the few proud FR purists) are the only ones who could be right, and that the very candidates you supported are now wrong and somehow tainted because they have come to a different conclusion than you have.

They are not voting "lib", they are voting to remove a deadly cancer, one that will kill everything you believe in if not taken out.

It's that simple, and logical mind games won't let you get away from that.

133 posted on 06/21/2012 7:29:42 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt, the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

“They are not voting “lib”, they are voting to remove a deadly cancer, one that will kill everything you believe in if not taken out.”

They are voting for a liberal. It doesn’t matter in the end why they are doing it. People can rationalize ‘why’ they are voting for a liberal all day long. It does not change the fact that they are, in the end, pulling the lever for a person who has perhaps the MOST liberal republican record of governance ever.

That’s not a mind game. That’s fact. It’s also a fact that ABOs ‘believe’ that doing so is the right thing to do. Now how, in any accepted definition of what ‘conservatism’ is and what it stands for, can doing that EVER be a solution to any problem?

Obama schmama. When the next liberal antichrist rises from Obama’s political ashes (and lets be honest, there are thousands every bit as bad lusting for power in the Dem party) will it then be acceptable to run a liberal against them? Or God help us, another gets elected, should we run a lib against them?

WTF ever happened to standing for what you believe in? Do you think the FFathers, faced with literal death and the literal death of their families would have said...”Gee there’s this evil King wanting it his way so let’s run Bennedict Arnold against him”?

Lake, Obama is evil. He’s a tyrant. And before it’s over, yes, he’ll probably go full tilt Mao. You don’t ‘fix’ that by another only slightly less bad. You deal with the problem, not drag it out over and over and over through 20 elections.

We have a Constitution. That Constitution enumerates the process for dealing with misleaders like Zilch. That’s what our congress is for. They have the power and authority to reign his mullah loving ways. If they refuse to, then the country is already toast. How can ANYONE call it America with a tin pot tyrant at the helm, a castrated congress covering his sins and a population willing to go to a full tilt liberal and beg him for salvation?

Romney is not going to ‘save’ anything. In the past ‘weak’ alone he’s ducked Obamacare, the EO and Holder.

THAT is salvation for America? He’s not even elected yet and he’s ‘leading’ like a Democrat.


134 posted on 06/21/2012 7:48:16 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson