Well you know that's not the first place it appeared because what is there is a reprint of the Harvard Daily report. It was also reported in an AP wire story; he also got the magazine article on being editor of the Harvard Law Review and I believe that was the first place he told a reporter he went to Indonesia at age two. And although Fred is concerned about seeing this stuff get scrubbed which happens regularly when Barry is trying to hide his real story, this particular item is out there in a number of places.
Thus you get the kind of reaction to the facts you see here from his apologists. They would rather you not say that because it demonstrates that Stanley was not his real mother at all--initially she was just a glorified baby sitter.
Her role developed into something more than that--you can believe that she saw herself as sort of an adoptive mother.
But his true mother and her extended family in the US are at this point, a significant part of the effort that has made him a political figure. These people are being concealed for a reason.
True or not, his political supporters obviously believe that if the true story were known, it would render him an ineffective political leader. That is why they have spent so much money and gone to such lengths to conceal from America who he really is.
And thus, my continued hesitation/objection to posting anything from the combined research of a dedicated group, who have given so much time and effort. Thanks to all of you, you know who you are. And many thanks to the freeper who is storing the results off-site, and keeping it safe.
I should have said “reappeared” there first. Sorry. You won’t find it at Trowbridge’s because she has made her blog subscription only.
You seem to be saying this with some certainty.
Do tell! Who, in your opinion, is his true mother?