Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: jmaroneps37
It just seems backwards that America has to prove 0bama unfit for office via citizenship instead of 0bama proving he is fit for office via his citizenship.

It can't be that difficult to prove beyond any doubt the status of his citizenship and until there is no doubt he shouldn't hold an office requiring citizenship.

5 posted on 05/27/2012 8:10:36 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EGPWS
"It just seems backwards that America has to prove 0bama unfit for office via citizenship instead of 0bama proving he is fit for office via his citizenship."

The Twentieth Amendment, Section 3 places the burden of proof squarely upon the one seeking the office. It places the burden of verification upon Congress, who must then name an interim President if there is no proof provided.

27 posted on 05/27/2012 9:30:24 AM PDT by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: EGPWS

I see this damning situation evolving one of two ways.

Either we will decide NBC no longer matters or the future will see a requirement that a candidate prove eligibility beforehand.


34 posted on 05/27/2012 11:02:16 AM PDT by X-spurt (Its time for ON YOUR FEET or on your knees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: EGPWS

You need to get your terminology straight. Nobody disputes Obama’s citizenship—rather, what is in dispute is whether he is a NATURAL-BORN CITIZEN, as the Constitution specifies is required to be President.


61 posted on 05/28/2012 11:02:55 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson