Posted on 05/08/2012 12:52:59 PM PDT by Mich1193
"Exploring Your Destiny" Sunday Service Webcast w/ Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson. Topic: How most women are building a shameless society. What do you think?
(Excerpt) Read more at liberty.com ...
I think he’s an imbecile. That’s what I think.
The real question is if the natural state of women is being subservient to and unequal to men.
If they are then natural law keeping them from the vote would be justified.
For myself I hold that the natural state of women is being free and equal.
Thus any laws keeping them from the vote would be a violation of natural law.
Here’s the direct link to the video so nobody needs to visit that blog:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeFhA_sL38c&feature=player_embedded
Duck and cover!
I do believe that it’s established fact (I could be wrong) that no female vote, means no Obama, no Clinton, no Carter, no Kennedy, etc.
no it wasn’t. giving 18 year olds, unless they are serving in the military, was a dumb idea.
maybe welfare folks shouldn’t be allowed to vote
Christian right version of the American taliban.
Christian right version of the American taliban.
I would have no problem with a woman or anyone else that owned property having the vote.
/johnny
Regards,
GtG
Give me a break....
(A receptionist at Melvin’s publishing firm a fan of Melvin’s work, but he is not as charming as she thinks he’ll be.)
Woman:”How do you write women so well?”
Melvin: “I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.”
-As Good As It Gets (1997)
My 98% of the heated political debates I get into are with men.
My proposal:
1. No person on any kind of aid from the govenment (including medicare) can vote. All persons should be able to reject any aid.
2. No employee of the government, excepting soldiers, should be allowed to vote for elections regarding that tier of government. (i.e., federal employees can’t vote in federal elections, and state employees can’t vote in state elections).
Single/Divorced women vote for ‘rats in huge numbers.
The latest poll shows “single” women support 0bama at a 59 to 29 percent rate.
Married women support Romney by a less wide margin.
If they are then natural law keeping them from the vote would be justified.
For myself I hold that the natural state of women is being free and equal.
Thus any laws keeping them from the vote would be a violation of natural law.
I look at it without need to resort to gender, race or class. I argue that those who contribute should have the vote, and those who do not should not.
Representation without taxation is just as odious as Taxation without Representation.
I had a real estate agent visit my front porch this morning.
To make conversation, I stated at one point in time that the USA gave individuals a lot of freedom.
The real estate agent responded that she thought sometimes people were given too much freedom.
Needless to say, she left my front porch with a double earful of legal and comparative government information and opinion.
But I fear there are way too many just like her for it to make any significant impact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.