Due process is a constitutional right and a sole function of the courts, as well as the right to habeas corpus which is why Zimmerman under our constitutional law must be allowed to post bail. You do not apparently understand what due process is, zimmerman is getting due process as is Martin the fact that this is going to trial IS due process for Martin his right are being protected should Zimmerman via the evidence be found guilty of homicide then Martin's right to due process has be served. If because of the facts Zimmeran is no billed then again due process has been served as Zimmermans legal rights have been upheld to a speedy trial judged by his peers based on the principle that he is INOCENT until proven guilty the prosecution must prove that he intended malicious harm to Martin and killed him in such a state of mind. Zimmerman is innocent and acted in self defence until such time as the prosecution has proved beyond a reasonable doubt otherwise and then the jury of Zimmermans peers must decide if there is no longer a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman ment to maliciously kill Martin and acted on such intent. Only then is Zimmerman guilty, if you do not like that tuff sh1t that is constitutional laws we live in liberty under. If you disagree with the above then I sugest the DU is a site you should be whining too.
grrr sorry fat fingers and no spell check *innocent, *suggest :)