Maybe he will in court.
Why doesn’t Zimmerman’s history of violence towards LEO and women bother anyone on this thread?
Where's his convictions? He's not convicted, so any 'history' is conjecture at best, or bull$hit at worst.
Why doesn’t Zimmerman’s sketchy work history bother anyone?
Objection. Irrelevant. Sustained.
Why doesn’t it bother anyone that Zimmerman failed a psych. eval. and was turned down for the police academy?
Objection. Irrelevant. Sustained.
Why the “blind faith” is accepting Zimmermans version of events as gospel?
I'm waiting for the trial.
At the bail hearing, the lead prosecutor asked Zimmerman why he gave three different accounts of the events that night, why doesn’t that disturb you?
If an account changes by one word, it's a "different account." After hours and hours of questioning, that happens with tired people.
Why does the fact that the two lead homicide detectives did not blelieve Zimmerman’s account of what happened that night bother anyone?
At that time, there was no probable cause for an arrest. That's what matters.
Okay, I hear you. You also have to accept that Martin’s history is also irrelevant. So now we have a kid with no gun and an adult with a gun. With no background being admitted guess what we end up with? One dead kid.