[newzjunkey]

It's NOT the same statement. Santorum separates himself from the others by saying he believes current enforcement is insufficient. That is only so if he believes in a significantly broader view of "obscenity" which is the whole reason his statements are an issue.

Rather than accept he may have poorly stated his viewpoint or actually has a different take, Santorum apologists are attempting to cloud the waters with false equivalences made with other candidates' statements or attacking their supporters or anyone who dare question their golden idol.

Just yesterday on FR the attack line was anyone who questioned Santorum's perspective was a kiddie porn apologist. You lot are the worst possible advertisement for Santorum. It's the equivalent of Obama-worshipping drones: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil with a healthy dose of shut-your-face, mind-your-place.

[Houghton M.]

Nonsense. One can think current enforcement inadequate without calling for a broader definition of obscenity.

[Houghton M.]

“Just yesterday on FR the attack line was anyone who questioned Santorum’s perspective was a kiddie porn apologist.”

And take your strawman arguments and stuff them where the sun don’t shine.