Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT; All
Ahh... More duplicity from Santorum supporters.

Santorum's argument was the laws are not being enforced. One Freeper in the bag for Rick went as far as accusing anyone critical of Santorum's statement as defending child porn.

Your Newt "quote" is that the law will be enforced. It makes no claim the laws aren't already being enforced to his liking.

The message is clearly this: Santorum doesn't think the obscenity standard used now is broad enough.

107 posted on 03/19/2012 8:33:08 AM PDT by newzjunkey (Santorum: 18-point loss, voted for Sotomayor, proposed $550M on top of $900M Amtrak budget...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: newzjunkey

That would make your argument that Newt Gingrich believes Barack Obama is correctly enforcing the laws.

Since the question he was asked clearly implies that the laws are not being enforced, I don’t see how you could interpret his answer as being a “more of the same” argument.

Since I showed how both candidates used the same words as their operative plan (not the words about why, the words about what they would actually promise to do), I again don’t see how you can call this “duplicitous”.

I provided both quotes, so I’m hardly hiding anything like the people who attacked Santorum for his quote without showing the other quotes.


111 posted on 03/19/2012 11:26:25 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson