Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian
The guidance in Wong Kim Ark says this is NOT true. The courts in the 20th century seem to have forgotten this:
neither he nor his parents acting for him ever renounced his allegiance to the United States

The Ark court had no problem with accepting that someone who might be born a U.S. citizen can lose their citizenship because his parents renounced it for him. If we want to follow Ark for "guidance" on NBC, then we need to follow it here too, right??

623 posted on 02/04/2012 10:15:36 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 616 | View Replies ]


To: edge919
The Ark court had no problem with accepting that someone who might be born a U.S. citizen can lose their citizenship because his parents renounced it for him. If we want to follow Ark for "guidance" on NBC, then we need to follow it here too, right??

There were a number of 20th Century SCOTUS decisions on revokation/ renunciation of citizenship, including Afroyim v. Rusk and several others.

685 posted on 02/05/2012 4:29:44 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson