[Harlan1196]

Since it was not a trial, the judge was not restricted to evidence presented at the hearing. He had the obligation to apply existing law. Like it or not, Ankeny is existing case law.

[MHGinTN]

I find it interesting that a n00b is telling us what the judge did, as if the n00b assumes the authority to tell us what the judge did without telling us what the obama team did to instruct the judge without the plaintiff’s being privy to the instructions. It takes a special sort of enmey to play apologist for treachery. There is a certain smell about you, n00b.

[Greenperson]

At least you can spell the name of the case right. Ankeny, not Arkeny. Malihi got it wrong, while he was pulling cases out of his rear.

[Red Steel]

The judge pulls one out from the wrong state of Indiana. Hatfield may have a field day taking apart the worthless drivel that is written in Ankeny from the Indiana court, but this judge compounded his mistake by elevating Ankeny over the US Supreme Court holding in Minor v. Happesett. Although I don’t expect the judiciary on appeal to be honest since most have spines of jellyfish across the US. However, we all know what the truth is here and it’s not with Obama.

[SteveH]

He had the obligation to apply existing law.

within the jurisdiction which is the state of Georgia.

Like it or not, Ankeny is existing case law.

Ankeny is case law in the jurisdiction of the state of Indiana.

Indiana jurisdiction is not Georgia jurisdiction. So Malihi in Georgia had no obligation to apply Ankeny from Indiana.