Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: libertarian neocon

Given the opportunity, Obama will appoint another leftist radical to the Supreme Court. And then, another. Would Romney do the same? I think the answer is worth pondering. I can think of only one compelling reason to ever consider voting for Romney as opposed to staying home, and this is it.


22 posted on 02/02/2012 9:37:02 AM PST by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: andy58-in-nh

Check out Romney’s record on judges in Taxachusett’s. I believe most were very liberal.


30 posted on 02/02/2012 9:45:51 AM PST by freemarketsfreeminds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: andy58-in-nh

Does the name David Souter ring a bell? Harriet Miers would be there today if conservatives had not stood up. A Romney president is no guarantee at all of a conservative SCOTUS appointment. Odds are it would be a squish who would go full-blown lib after a year on the bench.


47 posted on 02/02/2012 10:12:04 AM PST by Lou Budvis (Not Romney. Not Now. Not in November.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: andy58-in-nh

Mittens is no stranger to extremist judges. He won’t appoint a conservative judge to the Supreme Court. He does not accept the limits on government per the constitution. He’s anti-second amendment, anti-right to life, and he’s for imposing amorality on the pubic in the case of homosexual dominance over religious freedom of speech and association. Mitt is a politically correct globalist and has no great commitment to the US or it’s constitution. He’s a typical limo-liberal corporatist guy. May as well put George Soros or Bill Gates in there.


61 posted on 02/02/2012 10:36:36 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: andy58-in-nh

I won’t stay home I’ll write in Newt and vote down ticket for true conservatives Romney wants power and his fellow cult member Harry Reid already has it as majority leader of the senate. They are true first to the LDS cult, they are taught to grab power and authority by any means necessary. Romney is not a republican and Reid isn’t a democrat they are LDS cultists.


63 posted on 02/02/2012 10:39:56 AM PST by StPaulRevert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: andy58-in-nh
Given the opportunity, Obama will appoint another leftist radical to the Supreme Court. And then, another. Would Romney do the same? I think the answer is worth pondering.

No pondering necessary. Just look at Romney's record of judicial appointments for your answer. From some estimates I've read, 70% of his appointments to the bench while he was Governor, were liberals.

You think Harriet Miers stank? You ain't seen nuthin, if Romney becomes president.

71 posted on 02/02/2012 10:53:08 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: andy58-in-nh
Given the opportunity, Obama will appoint another leftist radical to the Supreme Court. And then, another. Would Romney do the same? I think the answer is worth pondering. I can think of only one compelling reason to ever consider voting for Romney as opposed to staying home, and this is it.

I can think of one other reason (and God knows I hope it doesn't come down to that). The thought of Obama not having to face the voters again (and thus no longer having to hide his agenda) scares the crap out of me.

75 posted on 02/02/2012 10:59:57 AM PST by Marathoner (In the 80s we had Reagan, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope. Now we have Obama, no cash and no hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson