We, as conservatives, shouldn’t have to settle.Yes, only to support, or to vote for, Willard Weirdo Romney, isn't "settling," which implies a less than optimal choice, because Willard Romney is no choice at all for a movement conservative whether principled or pragmatic. To vote for, or support, Willard Romney, who as an unremarkable single term governor delivered RomneyCare with all its new rules, new taxes, its exchanges, its public option, and its mandates, is an effective betrayal of the core premises of a conservative line on policy or governance.
Hell will freeze over before another liberal (Willard is not a moderate) republican is crammed down my throat again.
I will have no part of destroying whats left of the conservative wing of the republican party. I’d write in The Lone Ranger first.