Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome

Either that or you support Obama.


3 posted on 12/29/2011 5:06:14 PM PST by SonofReagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: SonofReagan; onyx; trisham; RedMDer; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; big'ol_freeper; Jim Robinson; ...
Either that or you support Obama.

Screw you troll!

20 posted on 12/29/2011 5:16:51 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SonofReagan
Either that or you support Obama.

Either you vote for Santorum, or you're a communist leper.

53 posted on 12/29/2011 5:38:38 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SonofReagan
In other words, you are urging us to vote FOR all the things limited government conservatism stands against. Rationalize it how you will, but that's exactly what a vote for Romney would be.

And God forbid he won the White House, Romney -- and the people who voted for him out of fear, the people who were so busy thinking about who they were voting against that they missed completetly what they were voting FOR -- will strengthen liberalism and statism in the Republican party as well as the Democrat party. It would kill any hope of the Republican party providing an antidote to oppressive government expansion. Americans would come to hate the Republican party with all the passion of betrayal and cynicism.

If Obama won the White House, the Republican party would grow stronger: Congress would go right in the mid terms, and more and more Americans would identify the Democrat party as the party of Bigger Government, and find hope in the Republican party as its antidote.

Decisions made in fear are almost always, in retrospect, stupid decisions. Voting FOR all the things limited government conservatives stand against, i.e. Romney "because if you don't you support Obama" is a coward's rationale and a genuine coup for liberalism. Romney in the White House would be a coward's victory. Liberalism would win even bigger than it would if Obama was re-elected.

109 posted on 12/29/2011 6:12:23 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SonofReagan
Either that or you support Obama.

Wrong. A vote for either one means you support bigger, more intrusive government, only when you vote for Romney, you support making the Republican party the party of bigger, more intrusive government.

Fear is clouding your vision of reality.

110 posted on 12/29/2011 6:14:43 PM PST by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SonofReagan
Either that or you support Obama.

Another one trying to scare us into supporting RINO Romney by waving 0bama as a threat.

Photobucket

I will never again hold my nose and vote for a RINO.

I'd rather get the fight on now.

126 posted on 12/29/2011 6:41:06 PM PST by cayuga (The next Crusade will be a war of annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: SonofReagan

Did someone fart in here?


381 posted on 12/31/2011 3:01:43 PM PST by editor-surveyor (No Federal Sales Tax - No Way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson