I’ll type slowly - try to comprehend.
The link I provided was to post #552, by Jim Robinson. I left the link “hot” so that you could read to which post it referred on purpose, but somehow you missed it.
As a result, you are responding to things in other posts on that thread which have nothing to do with the question at hand.
No one is saying you can’t link to your blog, or claim authorship. What we are saying is that it’s a rude abuse of the forum to use it as a hit farm for your blog, especially when the article in question is, in truth, hardly worth reading, much less excerpting.
Before you try the same tired old saw - yes, I have posted full articles here on FR, “hotshot.” And there’s a picture of me, my wife, son and a couple of our dogs on my profile page, along with some biographical information you might want to digest before throwing any more insults this way.
Thanks for the information and the suggestion to check your profile.
Not for you to interpret this at all as me backing off ... the pictures of family and pets are nice, and thanks for your service, but I wasn’t really soliciting you for those. It was the other two.
Now let’s see a sample of your own, apparently-superiorly-worth-reading written work from some point in the last few months.