Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

$100,000 says Palin isn’t elected president in 2012
The Daily Caller ^ | June 20, 2011 | John Ziegler

Posted on 06/20/2011 8:39:58 AM PDT by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Friendofgeorge

HOWEVER, SHE WILL BE SWORN IN JAN SOMETHING 2013 AS THE FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT”

Wow. All caps even.

That’s confidence.

How do you know for certain that she will even run? Can you share that with us?


21 posted on 06/20/2011 9:00:05 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Et tu, Johnny Z?


22 posted on 06/20/2011 9:00:11 AM PDT by montag813 (SECURE THE DAMN BORDER! http://www.StandWithArizona.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I’ll raise u one.
$200,000 that Newt Gingrich won’t win the GOP nomination.

Palin may run she may not.
However, u can bet she will be working hard to elect another large group of Tea Party minded candidates running for anything!


23 posted on 06/20/2011 9:00:56 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
From the article: "Palin’s approval numbers ... fluctuate dramatically based on the nature of the sample."

Liberals and liberal apologists are at their most entertaining when they attempt to say something which has a rational basis.

The fact is that statistical results which depend upon the sample are an indication of nothing other than sampling error. And nowadays, intentional "sampling error" is the business of the main stream media.

24 posted on 06/20/2011 9:01:06 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GoCards
What happened to him to turn into a pissy pants???

Apparently, Palin decided not to accept his unsolicited advice. This, for some reason, has apparently made him go a bit "ape".

So, despite having some potentially valid points (none of which is particularly new, though), he marginalizes himself because of his "it's all about me" attitude regarding the whole thing.

25 posted on 06/20/2011 9:01:18 AM PDT by kevkrom (Imagine if the media spent 1/10 the effort vetting Obama as they've used against Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

52 times he uses the pronoun “I” in his piece.


26 posted on 06/20/2011 9:05:35 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

John Ziegler is a political landmark to be reckoned with.

The fault lies in Palin’s lap for snubbing him repeatedly, after Ziegler supported her above and beyond the call of duty and loyalty. Instead, palin replaced him with several questionable people, which Ziegler repeatedly describes.

One thing for sure, Palin will regret ever having lost him as one of her greatest and dedicated alies.


27 posted on 06/20/2011 9:06:35 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hattend
   Why is Sarah Palin “polarizing” but Baraq al O’Bama is never described as such.?

  because Sarah Palin is from Alaska and Obama is a citizen of Indonesia (far away from the North Pole!)
28 posted on 06/20/2011 9:07:10 AM PDT by Maurice Tift (You can't stop the signal, Mal. You can never stop the signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hattend
We always see phrases such as:

polarizing republican

ultra right wing

arch conservative

But we will NEVER see:

polarizing democrat

ultra left wing

arch liberal

29 posted on 06/20/2011 9:09:02 AM PDT by red-dawg (There is no such thing as "government money".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought
52 times he uses the pronoun “I” in his piece.

So, he moonlights as TOTUS writer?

;)

30 posted on 06/20/2011 9:10:46 AM PDT by kevkrom (Imagine if the media spent 1/10 the effort vetting Obama as they've used against Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445
Now Open..."HOLES R US". Need a hole? Need it dug deep? We dig 24/7. We never stop digging!!

Call 1-800-DIG-DEEP.

Ask for Mr Ziegler.

31 posted on 06/20/2011 9:10:54 AM PDT by JPG (Hey, LSM, how are those emails workin' out for ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

So you’re saying he got his little feelings hurt and now his going to behave like a child. If, indeed, Gov. Palin did “snub” him it appears she was smart to do so.


32 posted on 06/20/2011 9:11:22 AM PDT by beandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“an Obama team (and the mainstream media) that lusts after a chance to run against her”.
Let them lust.
It’s either her or someone who hasn’t entered EITHER, but who has a very decent chance of winning, like Jim DeMint.
What they’re doing with these bogus ‘challenges’ is rolling the dice on the still-growing Tea Party constituency, and putting that “swing vote” on the shoulders of Sarah Palin.
It’s almost like a dare, to see whether the Tea Party can beat the RINO and MSM choice, who now is Romney.
It’s assumed that if Palin does badly, should she run, it will be the death-blow to the Tea Party.
They have got ‘another think’ coming.
Palin in a sense though, in the RINO/MSM world, *would* polarize because her candidacy would rouse up enormous numbers of people tired of seeing another choice like the one she herself was saddled with 3 years ago, (McCain) and Obama. The polarization is ALL THEIR OWN DOING, ALL THEIR OWN MAKING,AND THEIRS TO TRY TO “SELL” AS A NEGATIVE THING.


33 posted on 06/20/2011 9:13:58 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“an Obama team (and the mainstream media) that lusts after a chance to run against her”.
Let them lust.
It’s either her or someone who hasn’t entered EITHER, but who has a very decent chance of winning, like Jim DeMint.
What they’re doing with these bogus ‘challenges’ is rolling the dice on the still-growing Tea Party constituency, and putting that “swing vote” on the shoulders of Sarah Palin.
It’s almost like a dare, to see whether the Tea Party can beat the RINO and MSM choice, who now is Romney.
It’s assumed that if Palin does badly, should she run, it will be the death-blow to the Tea Party.
They have got ‘another think’ coming.
Palin in a sense though, in the RINO/MSM world, *would* polarize because her candidacy would rouse up enormous numbers of people tired of seeing another choice like the one she herself was saddled with 3 years ago, (McCain) and Obama. The polarization is ALL THEIR OWN DOING, ALL THEIR OWN MAKING,AND THEIRS TO TRY TO “SELL” AS A NEGATIVE THING.


34 posted on 06/20/2011 9:13:58 AM PDT by supremedoctrine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Why is Chinless Man so focused on Palin losing? Why is this guy who once declared himself to be a member of the Church of Tiger Woods so interested in making Palin’s run a tawdry, cheap trial? Does he not know that people who go around making Undeniable Definitive Predictions in politics are usually wrong? Cue the Toesucking Dick Morris.


35 posted on 06/20/2011 9:16:34 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
Palin has one repetitious fault, where she refuses to listen to what people advise her to do or not do. She displayed that tendency with the McCain campaign, She did so with Ziegler and she is doing it now with her entire approach to how to run this NON campaign of hers.

This is also, not some recent problem or behavior of hers. She did the same thing a mayor, Governor, etc. She does things her way, without taking valid advice or criticism well. It's why she quit as governor and it is how she is running Sarah PAC, as well as her ridiculous “campaign”.

Palin is her own worst enemy.

36 posted on 06/20/2011 9:19:54 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP

LOL!!!!!

Your posts are killing me!


37 posted on 06/20/2011 9:22:38 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

The caps were more aimed at anybody that puts any stock in any political polls as the author here did.

IF she runs she wins, no question about it!

Just boggles my mind how people believe any of the polls..Alice in Wonderland comes to mind.

We are going to see a bunch of phony polls over the next few days suggesting that MB is in the lead or second place, all lies, but I await them anyway


38 posted on 06/20/2011 9:23:35 AM PDT by Friendofgeorge (SARAH PALIN 2012 OR BUST...NYTimes/MSM wants Bachmann to be the nominee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
John Ziegler is a political landmark to be reckoned with.

Mr Ziegler is that you?

Not sure a local talk show host and small budget film maker counts as a "political landmark".

39 posted on 06/20/2011 9:25:31 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (Giving politicians more tax money is like giving addicts free drugs to cure their addiction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
She did the same thing a mayor, Governor, etc

Funny thing about that -- she won those races, and was effective in the jobs. The only elective race she's lost was as McCain's VP, and that had a lot to do with McCain.

One of the marks of a leader is doing things their own way -- yes, they should listen to criticism and advice, but just because they don't always bow to it doesn't mean that they're not heeding it. But when putting together a team, you surround yourself with people who believe in the objective, not the one who says "don't even try".

40 posted on 06/20/2011 9:27:39 AM PDT by kevkrom (Imagine if the media spent 1/10 the effort vetting Obama as they've used against Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson