He says there is kerning in other 1961 Hawaii birth certificates - I have seen it in the WH PDF - but in no others, he has to produce the picture.
He says that the other birth certificates have straight type on curved paper - but I have not seen him post it.
He says the layers are scanning/ocr artifacts - but that has been debunked, and if he wants to demonstrate his own support for that assertion - he is free to do so.
He says the type in the Obama LFCOLB is like all others - lets see him show the cloned elements such as the boxes on other birth certificate scans - I’ve seen it in the WH PDF.
He says Karl Denninger is nuts, but i have seen nothing about Karl’s color aberration analysis that shows editing - not scanning artifact.
Winston is smoking something, and is isn’t tobacco.
We’ve all seen the WH PDF anomalies carefully illustrated - he needs to show his side - not just make claims.
book mark
I'm just aaying what the rules are.
Nor did I make them up. I'm just pointing out: these are the rules. Follow them or be considered wacked.
As much as us 60's & 70's types are want to 'appear wacked', that just is not good in debate.
You guys are going to have to duke this out. I'm not here.
IF I catch you breaking rules of logic, I'll break a ball (and you don't have a choice which one).