Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jeff Winston
Jeff Winston said: "Explain then the existence of the much HIGHER-resolution version of the document released by the Associated Press on the same day as the PDF file"

Hang in there, Jeff. On another thread I responded regarding the occurrence of characters with unusually identical pixel patterns. I found that such duplications appear in the copy of "Alice in Wonderland" from Google Books. I don't understand the details of how such an optimization would work, but obviously something is going on that might conceivably explain the duplications of character patterns in Obama's PDF.

It's my understanding that Obama's camp claims to have received two copies of his long form birth certificate in hard copy. Evidently the PDF file was created by someone at Obama's request.

I had seen poor copies of a different "high resolution" scan to which you have referred.

Could you tell me briefly how that scan was made, by whom, and of what document? Was this high resolution scan made directly from one of the hard copies held by the White House? In other words, was this high resolution scan made completely independently of the ugly, useless "optimized" PDF?

And finally, can you provide a link to the actual scanned document? I have seen parts of it but not the whole thing. Thanks.

163 posted on 05/20/2011 12:52:38 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
Hang in there, Jeff.

Thank you. The zombies hardly even attempt to defend their claims. It's all reposting of things that have essentially been disproven, plus personal attack. There seems to be a lot of those. If you don't believe the birther claims of forgery, then you're a troll, an Obot, etc., etc.

A full copy of the high-resolution document is available here.

181 posted on 05/20/2011 2:24:50 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

To: William Tell

Not that I’m saying it necessarily ISN’T a forgery, mind you. But none of the claims in the original document at the beginning of this thread, or any that I’ve seen since then, demonstrate such a fact.

As I said earlier somewhere, if it’s a forgery (and it may be), it’s a decent one.


183 posted on 05/20/2011 2:26:28 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson