[Jeff Winston]

You claim that it's a piss poor response.

Then please explain to us: How did they get a HIGH-resolution document (a small portion of which I post below) from a LOW-resolution forgery?

I will be waiting for your explanation.

[bluecat6]

Easy answer...

That is ABC news’s true SCAN of a paper COPY handed out at the briefing.

THAT is a real scan of a printed copy.

Easy....

[PA Engineer]

You posted a portion of the “flattened” AP document. This was covered quite extensively in the Denninger videos.

[Red Steel]

Sure, the AP one was a scan of a printer copy.

[CommieCutter]

“Sure, the AP one was a scan of a printer copy.”—Redsteel.
—
(Just woke up.)

Looks like you got you explanation. Hilarious. Hope you didn’t wait too long, Jeffrey.

[CommieCutter]

Most of your response was wrapped up by calling us crazy with your own incredulity, stamped and certified by your 30 years data entry. (OMG I said data entry, I hope this didn’t expose your identity/ sarc.)

Saying you have 30 years of “working with computer technology” is going to convince no one.(I can make the claim I have 15 years myself.) Asking you to elaborate— you feel you might be “exposed” if you go too far in requested explanation of qualifications is a freaking JOKE of an excuse.

[ml/nj]

How did they get a HIGH-resolution document (a small portion of which I post below) from a LOW-resolution forgery?

I'm not sure what you are talking about there is more resolution in the WH image (bottom) than the AP
image (top). Note that the pixels are smaller in the WH image, and that in the WH image detail is available
which is lost in the AP image (e.g. the small pixels which stick out of the body of the 'm')

ML/NJ