[GladesGuru]

This is the best reason to make sure you have a Sheriff in your county who is a strict Constitutionalist.

[ltc8k6]

The ISC says they can.

[whatexit]

Will they be searching other publishers as well?

[Eyes Unclouded]

If you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear fellow citizen.

Besides we don’t want the terrorists and drug dealers to win, do we?

[montag813]

This vile creature belongs at Gitmo with the other terrorists.

[ElkGroveDan]

Wow, sounds just like former LA Mayor Richard Riordan.

[KTM rider]

might as well,

the constitution has been hijacked and flown into the ground

we live in a fascist oligarchy now, no longer a representative republic

[The Magical Mischief Tour]

The police are clearly no longer our friends.

[RC one]

Fourth Amendment to the US constitution: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized".

Governor Daniels, you will be judged on this and only this.

[A. Morgan]

This Alone Disqualifies Mitch Daniels for the White House:

http://dailypundit.com/?p=41322

[maine-iac7]

This is moving way to fast. We'd better watch this close.

Just yesterday, the Indiana SC came down with this decision - nullifying the ‘Castle Doctrine” that gave us protection in our homes since 1215 (Magna Carta) - and again in our 4th Amendment -”modern Fourth Amendment???

Thus rules the court:
“We believe ... a right to resist an unlawful police entry into a home is against public policy and is incompatible with modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence,...”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/05/15/indiana-high-court-rules-people-resist-illegal-entry-police-homes/
No “RIGHT to resist UNLAWFUL POLICE ENTRY”

And the Sheriff is ready to roll today.

This smells. Is this the spearhead movement? Do they plan on pushing this from state to state - or when it gets to the SCOTUS, which it must, do they already have the votes to declare it valid?

This sheriff is widening the ‘right to search’ ANYONE'S house “at random” - meaning they wouldn't even need a hint of cause.

We are in deep doo doo, folks.

[SoldierDad]

So, we’re going to start with a complete search of the Sheriff’s house, right???

[Rennes Templar]

Contact info - no email available:

Newton County Sheriff’s Department
304 East Seymour Street
Kentland, IN 47951

Administrative: (219) 474-3331
Admin. Fax: (219) 474-3333

[sargon]

This notion of random searches without warrant is a formula for more dead cops and more dead citizens.

As it should be.

[GOPsterinMA]

Where’s the ACLU when you need them?

[trapped_in_LA]

It will be interesting to see how people react to this, my guess is that they’ll like sheep accept it and go on with their serf like existence. They’ll also gladly convict any fool that does manage to shoot a cop (now legally entering your home) of murder so don’t think that you’ll get off because of your righteous cause, it ain’t going to happen.

Sad how we’ve lost our rights one at a time in the interest of “feeling” safe and being “protected”, all the while being slowly made serfs to the ruling elite. Truly we have become a banana republic in every sense of the word. Oh well, I hear that the conclusion of the 22nd season of survivor was good!

[Hardraade]

“What is that commotion at the door??”

“Claymore. Go back to sleep.” :)

[Larry Lucido]

Post the whole blog not just a link. Some of us are on handhelds.

[Georgia Girl 2]

My whole family is originally from Indiana. When did it turn into a Marxist hellhole? I would understand if it was Detroit or Chicago or NYC but Indiana?

[Red Steel]

If this headline is true...this obviously smacks up against the 4th Amendment.