Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bluecat6

You’re assuming that Stanley Ann is actually Zero’s mother.


258 posted on 05/10/2011 4:24:43 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah

I just try to fit the curve to the data points as they say in advanced mathematics.

She may not be. But the data point that she is basically disappeared between early 1961 to September 1961 seems to fit.

But I certainly would not bet the house on this as a fact.

But that divorce in 1964 is somewhat of legal divider point. If the actual facts are different than that those represented in the divorce it will be hard to get to them. As I posted above I believe there are serious eligibility troubles beyond 1964. And at times I believe there is a desire to keep the spotlight on 1961, knowing that digging up fact different than the 64 divorce will be a very tough activity. In the computer security would it would be called a honey pot. I think the college reocrds and the SS number are the real prizes. What did the Don say after he was told the LFBC was out - “now lets see the college records.” Without blinking....he knew what the next move is.


266 posted on 05/10/2011 4:45:12 PM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson