How is the travel agenda of Obama's mother relevant to OBama's citizenship? Where she was in 1964, or why she was there, is immaterial to her son's citizenship, is it not?
"Pregnancy termination? After all one baby for a single mom in 1964 had to be hard. Two?"
Why would a woman who had family in HI, and was herself living off and on in HI, leave HI - one of the few states during the 1960s where abortion was legal - to travel to the Philippines to have an abortion? And, was abortion even legal in the Philippines? As catholic and Muslim as that country was and is, I would doubt it, highly.
Again, I don't think it has any relevance on Obama's citizenship, but I am fascinated by your logic.
I just heard their Corsi clip. What he said is that some BYU professor found iron spheres that were create in the World Trade Center fires. And that the government explanation was incorrect that the burning of the jet fuels did not get hot enough to create them, but only could have been created by another fuel or accelerant that had to be present. This appears to be a plausible statement. That might make him a full blown 911 Truther in the rat world, but it is only a statement of fact. Corsi left open the door that some innocuous fuel was already present in the buildings that created the iron nodules or spheres.
How is the travel agenda of Obama’s mother relevant to OBama’s citizenship? Where she was in 1964, or why she was there, is immaterial to her son’s citizenship, is it not?
What happened to her passport records, to be in the Philippines in 1964 she needed a passport. Got it? What else would her missing passport records show?