Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. K

Exactly. And someone JUST HAD TO ADD (Stanley) and if they said negro instead of African it would have also been more believable. (Only a liberal would think AFRICAN)


92 posted on 04/27/2011 12:08:26 PM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (If Obama announced his resignation that would probably bring gas to $2.30 within an hour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]


To: Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!

I go by my middle name per family tradition, and that signature was the first thing that jumped out at me. I have never signed an official document with my middle name only, only to go back and add my first name in parentheses. That a signer would use parentheses at all is bizarre.

It’s as if someone familiar with the recent Ann/Anna Toot story felt the need to add “(Stanley)” in there to clarify things. None of the signatures appear original to the birth certificate, either. “(Stanley)” in particular seems to have been written, not signed.

Is it not true that ANY alterations or markings on an official document renders it void?


256 posted on 04/27/2011 3:17:03 PM PDT by scott7278 ("...I have not changed Congress and how it operates the way I would have liked..." - BHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson