Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to wealthy: You can’t ‘just relax and go count your money’
The Daily Caller ^ | 23 Apr 2011

Posted on 04/23/2011 7:07:31 PM PDT by mandaladon

Reno, Nevada (CNN) — Over and over Thursday, President Barack Obama told workers at a renewable energy company that he is like them.

He remembers pumping gas when high oil prices ate a hole in his budget, he said. He knows he wouldn’t have made it through college without scholarships and loans.

And now as president, he promised that he won’t let the current debate on deficit reduction deny others the chance for the American dream he has lived.

“We can’t ignore future deficits, but just as ignoring deficits would mortgage our future, failing to invest in our kids and our infrastructure and our basic research and clean energy, that would be mortgaging our future, as well,” he said to applause. “And I’m not willing to do it.” Ads by Google

Alternative investmentsDiversifying Your Investment Free advice on Investing in UK Land www.vincipartnerscommodities.com

[...]

Repeating past calls for ending subsidies for oil companies and restoring higher tax rates for the highest-income Americans, Obama defended what he called his balanced approach to deficit reduction and depicted the Republican stance as favoring the well-to-do.

“I’m rooting for everybody to get rich,” he said. “But I believe that we can’t ask everybody to sacrifice and then tell the wealthiest among us, well, you can just relax and go count your money, and don’t worry about it. We’re not going to ask anything of you.”

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 0bama; economy; ge0taxes; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Nuc 1.1
Too bad someone in the audience didn't ask Obama if he Itemized.
41 posted on 04/23/2011 8:34:41 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Natural Born Taxpayer on Board...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord
Who the f*** decides that someone should give up 90 per cent of their earnings, you? For what, because the trillions spent a year is not enough?

We did good in the fifties not because of the top marginal rates, rather because we did not spend the trillions a year for low lifes who do not lift a finger to pull the wagon.

42 posted on 04/23/2011 8:38:02 PM PDT by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Well when “at some point I’ve made enough money” I intend to close up shop and fire everyone. Then there will be no tax revenue at all from anything I do. I mean why work for nothing? I’m working to retire and do nothing anyways so why not start early.
Sarc on/off - ??? I don’t know!!!


43 posted on 04/23/2011 9:01:32 PM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1FreeAmerican

He creates the illusion that everybody is Mr. Howell and doesn’t have anything to do with the success afforded by freedom. He is in “slave” mode and will push it to the hilt.


44 posted on 04/23/2011 9:04:45 PM PDT by eyedigress ((Old storm chaser from the west)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord
Look at the highest marginal tax rates through the 50s. They averaged around 90% for Pete's sake.

They had all kinds of tax deductions back then. Nowadays we have AMT. Go look it up.

45 posted on 04/23/2011 9:07:53 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

46 posted on 04/23/2011 9:12:43 PM PDT by NoLibZone (Impeach Obama & try him for treason / Homosexuals reject diversity / Unions finally caught for theft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: al baby

You still have some money?


47 posted on 04/23/2011 9:30:08 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

Taxes are totally fiscally unnecessary when you have a fiat money system that allows banks to create money out of thin air via fractional reserve lending policies.

Even former Fed chairmen have said there’s no need to tax people, that the tax code today is totally punitive. To keep people in line and reduce their personal power by taking their money.


48 posted on 04/23/2011 9:32:24 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

49 posted on 04/23/2011 9:34:56 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (0bamanomics: Trickle Up Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
We’re not going to ask anything of you.”

I think we can compromise on this. You can ask anything you want if I can tell you to go pound sand!

50 posted on 04/23/2011 10:06:46 PM PDT by Onelifetogive (I tweet, too...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobertClark

“.. there is no way to increase the tax burden of the “rich”.”

Actually there is. If “the rich” have idle money in accounts not earning interest to speak of, is it “safe?”

No.

Obama and Bernanke decided to begin printing money last year, meaning an invitation for inflation to knock on the door of your savings. Inflation (a tax, especially if intentional which this is) will dilute your savings costing you x% of its original value.

Better to just invest it all in Securities and ride things out as best you can.


51 posted on 04/23/2011 10:14:36 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rembrandt

You don’t write a check on April 15th for devalued currency. Sure, the purchasing power may be dissolved, but that is not a direct tax.


52 posted on 04/23/2011 10:28:57 PM PDT by RobertClark (Coming 2013, Barack Obama to host new MSNBC game show, “Minute To Spin It”.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Yeah saw my pimp today


53 posted on 04/23/2011 10:35:28 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Studebaker Hawk

he siphons man goo


54 posted on 04/23/2011 10:37:15 PM PDT by al baby (Hi Mom!!! <sarc>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
IF I were a wealthy person who has earned gobs of money, I would ask this weasel if I earned it on my own it is MY right to count it not his to take it away any more than the principal has the right to take the grade A his daughters make in their classes and deduct enough points to give the C grade kid a B..oh sure, his “royal” kid would also have a B and the playing field would be “level” but it is still not right.
55 posted on 04/23/2011 10:49:45 PM PDT by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celtic gal

I would tell not ask that should read..sorry it is very late..


56 posted on 04/23/2011 10:50:44 PM PDT by celtic gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: RobertClark

even if the rich did nothing with their money, they would still have to store it somewhere. usually that would be a bank or the market. in either case, the cash is in the system being used and helping grow the economy.

the only situation where the rich are not participating would be when they take physical dollars and stack them in their basement safes. no one would actually do this (not with millions). even if they held gold in their basement safe, the dollars that bought it would be back in the system.

how people like 0bama are given any credibility is beyond me. it’s like i’m watching a live version of idiocracy.


57 posted on 04/23/2011 11:28:45 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JesusIsLord

Yours has got to be the most economically ignorant post I’ve ever seen on FR. I expected a /sarcasm tag somewhere it was so ridiculous.

You want tax rates of 0% for some people and 50% for others ? Why should anybody freeload and get their government services for free ?

Do you even know any of the numbers involved ? Here are a few:

1) Total personal income is roughly $13T.
2) Total Federal income tax receipts including individual filers and corporate filers is $1.3T
3) The average Federal income tax rate is 9.9%
4) The other $900B is coming from SS/M taxes and miscellaneous fuel & sin taxes, and import duties.

So ... you want some people to pay taxes at 50% just so other people from paying a mere 10% ? Because that is all it would take to raise the same revenue — 10% on individuals and 0% of Corporations.

Here’s what we need to do:

1) Flat tax on individual income of 10% with no exemptions, deductions, or credits
2) Eliminate Corporate taxation
3) Zero-base budgeting with separate budgets for SS/M and DOT that have their own tax bases
4) Give all Federal lands back to the states to manage
5) Eliminate all welfare, food stamps, foreign aid, housing assistance, Medicaid, and Obamacare

Eliminating the overhead and drag of Corporate taxes and letting high earners keep 90% of the fruits of their labor would make America the most attractive place in the world to operate a business. The economy would grow at 7% per year until unemployment was non-existent. Eliminating unemployment alone would add $200B to revenues and cut spending by $150B in the first year. The economic growth would push income tax revenues to $2T within five years and SS/M + misc revenues to $1.3T. In addition, the low tax rates on doctors would reduce the cost of healthcare.


58 posted on 04/24/2011 1:21:02 AM PDT by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: al baby

The rich cant just relax and count their money...unless they are the CEO of GE, then he can relax and not worry about anything because he bought the POTUS.


59 posted on 04/24/2011 2:36:44 AM PDT by Yorlik803 (better to die on your feet than live on your knees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

We pay more and more taxes, in return for which we get less and less of what we elect them to do, and more and more of what looks increasingly like tyranny.


60 posted on 04/24/2011 3:06:47 AM PDT by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson